Environmentalists are Ugly and they Smell

The great dichotomy of our times, given that everybody knows we all agree that environmental yadda yadda is the globe’s greatest concern, is how come, now everyone’s on side for planet-saving, nobody wants to vote for the saviours?   Why is the green movement unable to make any appreciable dent in a western democracy?  Nobody likes politicians, but apparently we like green politicians even less.

The truth is, environmentalists are just not attractive.  They’re not winning, engaging, amusing or empathetic.  They are ranty, repetitive, patronising, demanding, deaf, weirdly bonkers and smelly.  Environmentalists are the nutters with degrees in composting who sit next to you on the bus.

But that’s not their real impediment.  The real killer thing is the schadenfreude: the naked, transparent, hand-rubbing glee with which they pass on every shame, sadness and terror.  No disaster is too appalling or imminent that the green movement can’t caper and keen with a messianic glee.

This is a real problem.  Or, rather, it’s a serious blockage on the road to solving the real problem. Eco-advocates are viscerally unconscionable people.  The enormous, vicarious pleasure they get from frightening folk makes them repellent, and they get all hurt when we don’t thank them for it.  Nobody wants to trust a future to a bunch of malcontents who plainly have so much of their self-worth and cachet invested in it all going to hell in a recycled handcart.

This isn’t merely a question of presentation, or marketing, or tone, or spin, this is serious cultural blindness and childish arrogance.  Green campaigners are a larger part of the problem than jumbo jets and cow farts, and if your children drown in rising seas, or die of thirst or skin cancer, well, you can just blame the Green Brigade for being so crawlingly unattractive.

from AA Gill's column in the Sunday Times last weekend


2 thoughts on “Environmentalists are Ugly and they Smell

  1. Did you hear Dave of the solution to all the current politician money grabbing? From a Radio 5 listener in Cornwall…
    We all decide not to vote for a sitting incumbant — anywhere — but to vote for the Party/Person who came second (or third or fourth) in the 1995 election. Thereby replacing the whole 624 members at one go, with a very different mix of parties!
    What fun the media pundits would have trying to ‘explain’ the electorate’s choice.
    I think we should all try it out on 3rd June…
    And think of the fun they’d all have trying to decide who would be Prime Minister…

  2. OR
    No one votes, whatsoever, in the general election. Thereby, no MPs can legally be returned, and the Queen will have to nominate the Parliament herself. Since she is the one remaining public figure who is universally trusted, confidence in government will be restored and we can all live happily ever after …

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s